Skip to Main Content francais
WSIB logo
Prevention Banner
Search
Newsroom
Forms
Policy
Research
Resources
Partners
Community Network
About Us
Ontario Worker
HomePreventionEmployersWorkersHealth Care Professionals
Home > Research > Research Program > Hearing Protectors, Safety Glasses, and Respiratory Protective Equipment in Combination: Effect on Sound Attenuation
Research
    Change text sizeEmail a FriendPrint Friendly Version
    Centre of Research ExpertiseRAC

    Hearing Protectors, Safety Glasses, and Respiratory Protective Equipment in Combination: Effect on Sound Attenuation

    Principal investigator(s):Sharon M. Abel (Mount Sinai Hospital)
    Co-investigator(s):Andrea Sass-Kortsak (University of Toronto)
    Sponsoring Institution:Mount Sinai Hospital

    For more information about this study please contact Dr. Sharon M. Abel at e-mail: sharon.abel@drdc-rddc.gc.ca

    Results
    The results of this study showed that for each of five protective conditions, the noise reduction provided by earmuffs increases as frequency increases from 0.25 kHz to 1 kHz, after which there was no further increase.

    Five Hearing Test Conditions
    1. earmuffs mounted on a hard hat,
    2. earmuffs on the hard hat and with safety glasses
    3. earmuffs mounted on a hard hat and with a respirator,
    4. earmuffs on the hard hat with both the glasses and respirator, and
    5. no earmuffs, glasses or respirator

    The greatest noise reduction occurred with the muff on the hard hat alone, and the least noise reduction occurred with the muff on the hard hat used in combination with the safety glasses and the respirator. The difference between these two conditions was greatest at the lowest frequencies tested (0.25 and 0.5 kHz).

    Generally, noise reduction was slightly greater for men than for women. All subjects had significantly poorer consonant discrimination in a noisy environment, compared to quiet, but this was worse for those subjects with an existing hearing loss. Hearing-impaired subjects also performed more poorly when wearing the muffs.

    Conclusions
    These results demonstrate that wearing other protective safety gear around the head can interfere with the hearing protection provided by earmuffs. They also show that for people with a hearing loss, the use of earmuffs might increase the handicap.

    Objective
    This study was designed to determine whether the hearing protection provided by earmuffs would be reduced by wearing them in combination with other safety gear also worn around the head area (e.g. hard hats, safety glasses, respirators)

    Methods
    Seventy-two working age subjects (36 men and 36 women) were included in the study. In both groups, 12 subjects were under the age of 40 and had normal hearing. 24 subjects were over the age of 40; 12 with normal hearing and 12 with hearing loss typical of the damage caused by exposure to noise.

    Two kinds of tests were performed on each subject. The ability to hear sounds was determined by measuring diffuse field hearing thresholds in quiet, and at 8 different frequencies ranging from 0.25 kHz to 8.0 kHz. The second test measured the ability to discriminate consonants in quiet and in the presence of background noise.

    These two tests were performed on each subject five times:
    1. with earmuffs mounted on a hard hat,
    2. with earmuffs on the hard hat and with safety glasses,
    3. with earmuffs mounted on a hard hat and with a respirator,
    4. with earmuffs on the hard hat with both the glasses and respirator, and
    5. with no earmuffs, glasses or respirator.

    Publications
    Abel, S.M., Sass-Kortsak, A., and Kielar, A. (2002). “The effect on earmuff attenuation of other safety gear worn in combination.” Noise & Health 5:1-13.




    Home | Prevention | Employers | Workers | Health Care Practitioners
    Newsroom | Forms | Policy | Research | Resources | Partners | Community NetWork | About Us
    ® 1998-2009, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board